Seat Ibiza 2006 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 126 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.6 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 77 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 124 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 7.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 62 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Ibiza is 42 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 10 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 324 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Seat Ibiza has 57 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Volvo V40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 695 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |