Seat Ibiza 2006 vs Skoda Fabia 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 65 HP | |
Torque: | 126 NM | 112 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 15.9 seconds | |
Seat Ibiza is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ibiza engine produces 10 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 14 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Ibiza could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
650 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.95 m | 3.96 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
Seat Ibiza is 1 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 5 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 260 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1015 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ibiza has 7 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The Skoda Fabia may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`575 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | below average | |
Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Ibiza, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1800 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |