Seat Ibiza 2006 vs Renault Clio 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 15 seconds | |
| Seat Ibiza engine produces 4 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 19 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 620 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Seat Ibiza can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Seat Ibiza version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is larger. Seat Ibiza is 14 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 6 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1035 litres | |
| Seat Ibiza has 12 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.3 metres more than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Renault Clio has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Ibiza, so Renault Clio quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Renault Clio has
| |