Seat Ibiza 2008 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Seat Ibiza and Alfa Romeo MiTo have the same engine power, but Seat Ibiza torque is 10 NM more than Alfa Romeo MiTo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
| By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo MiTo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Ibiza could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Ibiza is 3 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo MiTo, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 284 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
938 litres | 684 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ibiza has 14 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo MiTo. The Alfa Romeo MiTo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Ibiza (by 254 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.5 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo MiTo, which means Seat Ibiza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`601 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Seat Ibiza has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo MiTo has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Seat Ibiza, so Seat Ibiza quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
| |
