Seat Ibiza 2011 vs Renault Clio 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 132 NM | 151 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
| Seat Ibiza engine produces 25 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 19 NM less than Renault Clio. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Clio 2009 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Clio 2009 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is smaller. Seat Ibiza and Renault Clio are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 439 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
430 litres | no data | |
| Seat Ibiza has 9 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`570 | 1`705 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Seat Ibiza has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Seat Ibiza, so Seat Ibiza quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Renault Clio has
| |