Seat Ibiza 2010 vs Skoda Roomster 2010

 
Seat Ibiza
2010 - 2012
Skoda Roomster
2010 - 2015
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 75 HP105 HP
Torque: 180 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.6 seconds11.5 seconds
Skoda Roomster is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Ibiza engine produces 30 HP less power than Skoda Roomster, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Skoda Roomster. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.44.7
Real fuel consumption: 4.8 l/100km5.3 l/100km
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1320 km in combined cycle1170 km in combined cycle
1500 km on highway1340 km on highway
930 km with real consumption1030 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.23 m4.21 m
Width: 1.69 m1.68 m
Height: 1.45 m1.61 m
Seat Ibiza is larger, but lower.
Seat Ibiza is 1 cm longer than the Skoda Roomster, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Ibiza is 16 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres480 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
430 litresno data
Skoda Roomster has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Seat Ibiza uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.5 meters
Gross weight: 1`645 kg1`777 kg
Net weight:1`130 kg1`322 kg
Load capacity:515 kg455 kg
Seat Ibiza load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem more than Skoda Roomster. Therefore, Seat Ibiza is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

average
Skoda Roomster has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Roomster quality is probably better
Average price (€): 42003400
Pros and Cons: Seat Ibiza has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Skoda Roomster has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv