Seat Ibiza 2010 vs Citroen Berlingo 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.6 seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
|
Citroen Berlingo is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 15 HP less power than Citroen Berlingo, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Citroen Berlingo. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.8 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1320 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1500 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Fabia, Skoda Roomster | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Ibiza might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is smaller. Seat Ibiza is 15 cm shorter than the Citroen Berlingo, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 36 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 675 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
430 litres | 3000 litres | |
|
Citroen Berlingo has more luggage space. Seat Ibiza has 245 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Berlingo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen Berlingo (by 2570 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 1 metres less than that of the Citroen Berlingo, which means Seat Ibiza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`645 | 2`040 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Seat Ibiza has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Citroen Berlingo, so Seat Ibiza quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Citroen Berlingo has
| |