Seat Ibiza 2012 vs Kia Ceed 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Seat Ibiza engine produces 23 HP less power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Kia Ceed. Despite less power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 5.6 | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Ibiza consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| Seat Ibiza gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is smaller. Seat Ibiza is 28 cm shorter than the Kia Ceed, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 528 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1642 litres | |
|
Kia Ceed has more luggage space. Seat Ibiza has 98 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.1 metres less than that of the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`680 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Seat Ibiza has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Kia Ceed, so Seat Ibiza quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |