Seat Ibiza 2012 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
| Seat Ibiza engine produces 2 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volvo V40. Despite less power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 62 litres | |
| 650 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Ibiza is 14 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 11 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 324 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
|
Seat Ibiza has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ibiza has 106 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The Volvo V40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`735 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Volvo V40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 435 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |