Seat Ibiza 2012 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 30 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Ibiza gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.50 m | |
| Seat Ibiza is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 5 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Seat Ibiza has 50 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Seat Ibiza can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`735 | 1`713 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Fabia is better rated in child safety tests. The Skoda Fabia scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |