Seat Ibiza 2012 vs Mazda 2 2010
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Seat Ibiza is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ibiza engine produces 75 HP more power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 101 NM more than Mazda 2. Thanks to more power Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Ibiza could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Mazda 2 2010 1.3 engine: The engine is generally robust, but the use of poor-quality fuel can lead to increased burn formation. Idling speeds tend to be unstable. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
| Seat Ibiza is 31 cm longer than the Mazda 2, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Ibiza is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 250 litres | |
|
Seat Ibiza has more luggage capacity. Seat Ibiza has 180 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda 2, which means Seat Ibiza can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`735 | 1`455 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Mazda 2 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |