Seat Ibiza 2012 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 16.7 seconds | |
|
Seat Ibiza is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ibiza engine produces 45 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 67 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 6.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Ibiza 2012 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifetime is relatively short. Vibration at idling speed tends to be excessive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.50 m | |
| Seat Ibiza is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 5 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Seat Ibiza has 50 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Seat Ibiza can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`605 | 1`565 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Fabia is better rated in child safety tests. The Skoda Fabia scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |