Seat Ibiza 2012 vs Kia Ceed 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.6 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 15 HP less power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Kia Ceed. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.8 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1320 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1500 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Fabia, Skoda Roomster | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai i30, Kia Cerato | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Ibiza might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is smaller. Seat Ibiza is 26 cm shorter than the Kia Ceed, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 534 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1664 litres | |
|
Kia Ceed has more luggage space. Seat Ibiza has 104 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.2 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`660 | 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Seat Ibiza has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Kia Ceed, so Seat Ibiza quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |