Seat Ibiza 1994 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 166 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
|
Seat Ibiza is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ibiza engine produces 1 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, but torque is 4 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Thanks to more power Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 5.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 600 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is smaller. Seat Ibiza is 82 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 31 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
580 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Seat Ibiza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Volkswagen Sharan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 140 percent more cases than Volkswagen Sharan, so Volkswagen Sharan quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |