Seat Ibiza 1994 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 15 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is smaller. Seat Ibiza is 82 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 31 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
580 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Seat Ibiza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Volkswagen Sharan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 140 percent more cases than Volkswagen Sharan, so Volkswagen Sharan quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |