Seat Ibiza 1996 vs Mitsubishi Colt 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 15 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, but torque is 8 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is smaller, but higher. Seat Ibiza is 7 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
580 litres | 830 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ibiza has 30 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The Mitsubishi Colt may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Colt (by 250 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`445 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |