Seat Ibiza 1996 vs Fiat Croma 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Fiat Croma is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 102 HP less power than Fiat Croma, whereas torque is 97 NM less than Fiat Croma. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 6.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 10.0 | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Ibiza consumes 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Croma, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 525 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| Seat Ibiza gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is smaller. Seat Ibiza is 71 cm shorter than the Fiat Croma, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
580 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.8 metres less than that of the Fiat Croma, which means Seat Ibiza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Fiat Croma has
| |