Seat Ibiza 1993 vs Volkswagen Polo 1994

 
Seat Ibiza
1993 - 1995
Volkswagen Polo
1994 - 1995
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.3 Petrol1.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 54 HP55 HP
Torque: 95 NM100 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.8 seconds16.3 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Ibiza engine produces 1 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.06.5
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Seat Ibiza consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Ibiza could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 47 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle690 km in combined cycle

Dimensions

Length: 3.81 m3.72 m
Width: 1.64 m1.66 m
Height: 1.42 m1.42 m
Seat Ibiza is 9 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 270 litres245 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
580 litres975 litres
Seat Ibiza has 25 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 395 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10.1 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`375
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 600800
Pros and Cons: Seat Ibiza has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv