Seat Ibiza 1996 vs Volvo C30 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Volvo C30 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 46 HP less power than Volvo C30, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Volvo C30. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.5 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Seat Ibiza 1996 1.9 engine: This engine stands out for its durability and generally remains trouble-free until it has been used extensively over many years. Despite its robust construction, the wear and tear from prolonged use, ... More about Seat Ibiza 1996 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is smaller. Seat Ibiza is 40 cm shorter than the Volvo C30, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
802 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Ibiza has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ibiza has 204 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C30. The Volvo C30 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo C30, which means Seat Ibiza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`530 | 1`840 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Volvo C30 has
| |