Seat Ibiza 1996 vs Volvo C30 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.3 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Volvo C30 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 72 HP less power than Volvo C30, whereas torque is 195 NM less than Volvo C30. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 6.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Ibiza could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo C30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is smaller. Seat Ibiza is 40 cm shorter than the Volvo C30, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
580 litres | no data | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ibiza has 19 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C30. The Volvo C30 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo C30, which means Seat Ibiza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`450 | 1`840 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Volvo C30 has
| |