Seat Ibiza 1996 vs Rover 200 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 174 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 55 HP less power than Rover 200, whereas torque is 29 NM less than Rover 200. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 6.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 6.5 | |
|
The Rover 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Ibiza consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Ibiza could require 405 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 480 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Rover 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Ibiza engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Vento, Seat Toledo, Seat Cordoba | Used also on Rover 25 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Ibiza might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is smaller. Seat Ibiza is 12 cm shorter than the Rover 200, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 304 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
580 litres | 1086 litres | |
|
Rover 200 has more luggage space. Seat Ibiza has 34 litres less trunk space than the Rover 200. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 200 (by 506 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.6 metres less than that of the Rover 200, which means Seat Ibiza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`430 | 1`520 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Rover 200 has
| |