Seat Ibiza 1997 vs Skoda Felicia 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Seat Ibiza and Skoda Felicia have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Felicia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Felicia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Ibiza could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Felicia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Ibiza is 1 cm shorter than the Skoda Felicia, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
580 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.7 metres less than that of the Skoda Felicia, which means Seat Ibiza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`380 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Seat Ibiza has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Seat Ibiza, so Seat Ibiza quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Skoda Felicia has
| |