Seat Ibiza 1997 vs Rover 200 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 37 HP less power than Rover 200, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Rover 200. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Ibiza could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Rover 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Ibiza engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Seat Cordoba | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Rover 25, Rover 400, Rover 45 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is smaller. Seat Ibiza is 12 cm shorter than the Rover 200, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 304 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
580 litres | 1086 litres | |
|
Rover 200 has more luggage space. Seat Ibiza has 34 litres less trunk space than the Rover 200. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 200 (by 506 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.6 metres less than that of the Rover 200, which means Seat Ibiza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`380 | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Rover 200 has
| |