Seat Ibiza 1996 vs Volvo C30 2006

 
Seat Ibiza
1996 - 1997
Volvo C30
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP100 HP
Torque: 125 NM150 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.9 seconds11.8 seconds
Volvo C30 is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Ibiza engine produces 25 HP less power than Volvo C30, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Volvo C30. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.17.0
Real fuel consumption: 8.1 l/100km7.8 l/100km
By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Ibiza could require 15 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 630 km in combined cycle780 km in combined cycle
760 km on highway960 km on highway
550 km with real consumption700 km with real consumption
Volvo C30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.85 m4.25 m
Width: 1.64 m1.78 m
Height: 1.42 m1.45 m
Seat Ibiza is smaller.
Seat Ibiza is 40 cm shorter than the Volvo C30, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data251 litres
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo C30, which means Seat Ibiza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`700
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 8003000
Pros and Cons: Seat Ibiza has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Volvo C30 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv