Seat Ibiza 1996 vs Rover 200 1996
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 HP | 103 HP | |
Torque: | 116 NM | 127 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
Rover 200 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 43 HP less power than Rover 200, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Rover 200. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 7.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
840 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
630 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.85 m | 3.97 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
Seat Ibiza is smaller. Seat Ibiza is 12 cm shorter than the Rover 200, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 304 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1086 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.6 metres less than that of the Rover 200, which means Seat Ibiza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`480 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Rover 200 has
| |