Seat Ibiza 1996 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 141 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 43 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 8.4 | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Ibiza consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| Seat Ibiza gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is smaller, but higher. Seat Ibiza is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 830 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Ibiza, so Mitsubishi Colt quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |