Seat Ibiza 1999 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 141 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Seat Ibiza engine produces 3 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, but torque is 4 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 8.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 530 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.36 m | |
| Seat Ibiza and Mitsubishi Colt are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 830 litres | |
| Seat Ibiza has 10 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Seat Ibiza can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Ibiza, so Mitsubishi Colt quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |