Seat Ibiza 2000 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 126 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Seat Ibiza engine produces 7 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, but torque is 6 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.36 m | |
| Seat Ibiza and Mitsubishi Colt are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
782 litres | 830 litres | |
| Seat Ibiza has 10 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Colt (by 48 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Seat Ibiza can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`445 | 1`445 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |