Seat Ibiza 1999 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2000

 
Seat Ibiza
1999 - 2002
Mitsubishi Colt
2000 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 60 HP82 HP
Torque: 116 NM120 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.1 seconds12.5 seconds
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Ibiza engine produces 22 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.66.9
Real fuel consumption: 7.2 l/100km6.6 l/100km
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
840 km on highway900 km on highway
620 km with real consumption750 km with real consumption
Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.88 m3.88 m
Width: 1.64 m1.68 m
Height: 1.42 m1.36 m
Seat Ibiza and Mitsubishi Colt are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 250 litres240 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
782 litres830 litres
Seat Ibiza has 10 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Colt (by 48 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Seat Ibiza can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4151`445
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 1200800
Pros and Cons:
    Mitsubishi Colt has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • fewer faults
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv