Seat Ibiza 2003 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 17 seconds | |
|
Seat Ibiza is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ibiza engine produces 51 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 6.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 4.7 | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Ibiza consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Ibiza could require 450 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is larger, but slightly lower. Seat Ibiza is 5 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 5 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1030 litres | |
| Seat Ibiza has 5 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`648 | 1`630 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Seat Ibiza has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Polo, so Seat Ibiza quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |