Seat Ibiza 2002 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
|
Seat Ibiza is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ibiza engine produces 55 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 115 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Ibiza could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is larger, but slightly lower. Seat Ibiza is 5 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 5 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 975 litres | |
| Seat Ibiza has 20 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Ibiza (by 55 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`550 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Seat Ibiza has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Polo, so Seat Ibiza quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |