Seat Ibiza 2002 vs Skoda Fabia 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Seat Ibiza) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Skoda Fabia) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 126 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 17 seconds | |
|
Seat Ibiza is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ibiza engine produces 55 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 184 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 7.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 420 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Ibiza gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Skoda Fabia 2004 1.4 engine: Engine is known for its simplicity, compact design, and overall reliability. Many complaints from owners are related to power loss or fluctuating idle, often caused by issues with the throttle body, EGR valve, or air leaks ... More about Skoda Fabia 2004 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
| Seat Ibiza is 1 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 5 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1015 litres | |
| Seat Ibiza has 5 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Ibiza (by 15 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Ibiza, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |