Seat Ibiza 2002 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 64 HP | 64 HP | |
Torque: | 125 NM | 125 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17 seconds | 17 seconds | |
Seat Ibiza and Volkswagen Polo have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.7 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
1150 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
810 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 700'000 km | 700'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 14 years | 14 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.95 m | 3.90 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
Seat Ibiza is larger, but slightly lower. Seat Ibiza is 5 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 5 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 270 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1030 litres | |
Seat Ibiza has 5 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`620 | 1`630 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Seat Ibiza has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Polo, so Seat Ibiza quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |