Seat Ibiza 2006 vs Renault Clio 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 126 NM | 151 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 12 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Seat Ibiza can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Seat Ibiza version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Renault Clio 2005 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Clio 2005 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is smaller. Seat Ibiza is 4 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 288 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1035 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Seat Ibiza has 23 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 5 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.7 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Seat Ibiza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`568 | 1`640 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Renault Clio has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Ibiza, so Renault Clio quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Renault Clio has
| |