Seat Ibiza 2006 vs Renault Clio 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 HP | 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 28 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Seat Ibiza can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Seat Ibiza version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is smaller. Seat Ibiza is 4 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 288 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1035 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Seat Ibiza has 23 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 5 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.1 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`537 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Seat Ibiza has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Clio, so Seat Ibiza quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Renault Clio has
| |