Seat Ibiza 2008 vs Renault Clio 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 5 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio 2009 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Clio 2009 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.49 m | |
| Seat Ibiza and Renault Clio are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 288 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
938 litres | no data | |
| Seat Ibiza has 4 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`601 | 1`665 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Seat Ibiza has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Seat Ibiza, so Seat Ibiza quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Renault Clio has
| |