Seat Ibiza 2008 vs Renault Clio 2008
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 85 HP | 100 HP | |
Torque: | 132 NM | 127 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 11 seconds | |
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 15 HP less power than Renault Clio, but torque is 5 NM more than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
880 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
640 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.05 m | no data | |
Width: | 1.69 m | no data | |
Height: | 1.45 m | no data | |
Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
938 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`526 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | low | |
Seat Ibiza has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Seat Ibiza, so Seat Ibiza quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 3200 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Renault Clio has
| |