Seat Ibiza 2012 vs Volvo C30 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Seat Ibiza is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ibiza engine produces 7 HP more power than Volvo C30, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is smaller. Seat Ibiza is 20 cm shorter than the Volvo C30, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 251 litres | |
|
Seat Ibiza has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ibiza has 41 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C30. The Volvo C30 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo C30. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`696 | 1`840 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Seat Ibiza has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo C30 has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Seat Ibiza, so Seat Ibiza quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Volvo C30 has
| |