Seat Ibiza 2012 vs Volvo C30 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 LPG | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 81 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo C30 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 19 HP less power than Volvo C30, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Volvo C30. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 7.0 | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Ibiza consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is smaller. Seat Ibiza is 19 cm shorter than the Volvo C30, 9 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 222 litres | 251 litres | |
|
Volvo C30 has more luggage space. Seat Ibiza has 29 litres less trunk space than the Volvo C30. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo C30. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`610 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Seat Ibiza has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo C30 has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Seat Ibiza, so Seat Ibiza quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Volvo C30 has
| |