Seat Ibiza 2012 vs Volvo C30 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 132 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Seat Ibiza engine produces 15 HP less power than Volvo C30, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Volvo C30. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 7.0 | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Ibiza consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is smaller. Seat Ibiza is 20 cm shorter than the Volvo C30, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 251 litres | |
|
Seat Ibiza has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ibiza has 41 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C30. The Volvo C30 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo C30. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`526 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Seat Ibiza has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo C30 has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Seat Ibiza, so Seat Ibiza quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Volvo C30 has
| |