Seat Ibiza 2013 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 85 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 132 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
Seat Ibiza is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ibiza engine produces 55 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 118 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.9 | |
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Ibiza consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
1120 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
Seat Ibiza gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.05 m | 3.97 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.49 m | |
Seat Ibiza is larger, but lower. Seat Ibiza is 8 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 284 litres | 280 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
Seat Ibiza has 4 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`630 | 1`550 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | average | |
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 5200 | 4000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |