Seat Ibiza 2012 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 230 NM | 230 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Seat Ibiza and Volkswagen Polo have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.3 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
1210 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.05 m | 3.97 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.49 m | |
Seat Ibiza is larger, but lower. Seat Ibiza is 8 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 280 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
Seat Ibiza has 12 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`690 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | average | |
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 5200 | 4000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |