Seat Ibiza 2010 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 180 NM | 195 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 14 seconds | |
Seat Ibiza and Volkswagen Polo have the same engine power, but Seat Ibiza torque is 15 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 | 4.2 | |
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Ibiza consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1320 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
1500 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
Seat Ibiza gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.05 m | 3.97 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.49 m | |
Seat Ibiza is larger, but slightly lower. Seat Ibiza is 8 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 280 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
938 litres | 952 litres | |
Seat Ibiza has 12 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 14 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`601 | 1`650 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | average | |
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 3200 | 4000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |