Seat Ibiza 2010 vs Renault Clio 2009
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 175 NM | 105 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
Seat Ibiza is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ibiza engine produces 30 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.9 | |
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Ibiza consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
1020 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.05 m | 4.03 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.49 m | |
Seat Ibiza is 3 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 288 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
938 litres | no data | |
Seat Ibiza has 4 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`566 | 1`580 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | low | |
Seat Ibiza has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Seat Ibiza, so Seat Ibiza quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 3200 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Renault Clio has
| |