Seat Ibiza 2009 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
| Seat Ibiza engine produces 30 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 3.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | no data | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.50 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
938 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Seat Ibiza can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`644 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |