Seat Ibiza 2009 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 180 HP | |
Torque: | 220 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 30 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.2 | |
Seat Ibiza consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Ibiza could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
840 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.09 m | 4.00 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.50 m | |
Seat Ibiza is larger, but lower. Seat Ibiza is 9 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 5 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 300 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
938 litres | no data | |
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Seat Ibiza has 50 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. This could mean that the Seat Ibiza uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Seat Ibiza can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`693 | 1`718 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | average | |
Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 3200 | 3200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |