Seat Ibiza 2015 vs Renault Clio 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 15 HP less power than Renault Clio, but torque is 10 NM more than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 | 3.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.6 l/100km | 4.8 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Ibiza could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1320 km in combined cycle | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
| 970 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Clio 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Clio 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Ibiza and Renault Clio are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 300 litres | |
| Seat Ibiza has 8 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.6 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Seat Ibiza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`630 | 1`658 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Seat Ibiza has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Clio, so Seat Ibiza quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Renault Clio has
| |