Seat Ibiza 2015 vs Volkswagen Polo 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
|
Seat Ibiza is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ibiza engine produces 50 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 105 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 6.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Ibiza is 9 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
| Seat Ibiza has 12 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Seat Ibiza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`630 | 1`570 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |