Seat Ibiza 2015 vs Skoda Fabia 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 15.7 seconds | |
|
Seat Ibiza is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ibiza engine produces 50 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 105 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 6.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Ibiza is 7 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1150 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Seat Ibiza has 38 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. This could mean that the Seat Ibiza uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.4 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Seat Ibiza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |