Seat Ibiza 1993 vs Nissan Micra 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.0 - 1.3 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 45 - 129 HP | 54 - 75 HP | |
Torque: | 76 - 166 NM | 79 - 103 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 22.3 seconds | 12 - 19.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 8.6 | 5.8 - 6.3 | |
Seat Ibiza petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Micra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.81 m | 3.70 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.58 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
Seat Ibiza is larger, but slightly lower. Seat Ibiza is 11 cm longer than the Nissan Micra, 6 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 206 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
802 litres | 960 litres | |
Seat Ibiza has 64 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Micra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 158 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.6 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Seat Ibiza can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`433 | ~ 1`295 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |